< 2019

Reproduction biology of the round-leaved sundew (Drosera
rotundifolia L.) with special attention to its ex situ conservation

B. CZUPPON¹, L. PAPP JR.², Z. TÓTH³, M. SZÉPLIGETI⁴

^1,3Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology Eötvös Loránd University
H–1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Hungary; ¹biologus.elte@gmail.com
²Botanical Garden, Eötvös Loránd University, H–1083 Budapest, Illés u. 25, Hungary
⁴Őrség National Park Directorate, H–9941 Őriszentpéter, Városszer 57, Hungary
 

Accepted: 19 March 2019

Key words: Fekete-tó peat-bog, insectivorous plant, seed germination, seed morphology, substrate preference assay, vegetative propagation.

The aim of our study is to provide information on the ex situ conservation of the insectivorous round-leaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L. 1753). This glacial relict plant with circumboreal distribution is considered threatened, thereby it is protected in Hungary. Recently, habitat loss and degradation raise serious concerns regarding the survival of the Hungarian populations. We examined the reproduction biology of the species in order to elaborate a more efficient ex situ preservation protocol. Altogether, 11,400 seeds were sown in different treatments. The seed samples were obtained from two different sources. Part of the seeds were produced by plants obtained from horticulture (Netherlands), while the other group of seeds was collected from natural habitat in the Őrség National Park, SW Hungary. We studied seed morphology quantitatively on high resolution digital photographs by using a pixel-based image analysis program. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the influence of light, vernalization and different substrates on the success of germination. The efficiency of propagation of the plant from leaf cuttings were also examined. No difference was observed in seed morphology between the two groups with different source of origin. This suggests a high degree of homogeneity of seed traits for the species. Average seed size was 1.46 × 0.21 mm and the small (0.20 mm × 0.10 mm), ellipsoidal embryo is pale dark brown in color and it has a smooth surface with delicate stripes on it. Our results confirm that seeds require vernalization for germination. We observed the following tendency: the longer vernalization period the seeds received, the more successful germination could be observed. Maximum vernalization time used here was 5 weeks, but it would be appropriate to examine longer periods of treatment. Our experiment also confirmed that the seeds of this species need light for their germination. The living Sphagnum moss used in horticultural practice proved to be the best substrate for germinating D. rotundifolia seeds. Propagation from leaf cuttings was effective, thus maintaining the species ex situ is more efficient and faster than reproduction from seed. We consider this method as an emergency solution to reintroduce the plants to natural habitats
due to the low genetic diversity.

Full text     Electronic supplement

References

Andersson L., Milberg P. 1998: Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection. Seed Science Research 8: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258500003883
Andrus R. E. 1986: Some aspects of Sphagnum ecology. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1139/b86-057
Baranyai B., Joosten H. 2016: Biology, ecology, use, conservation and cultivation of roundleaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.): a review. Mires and Peat 18: 1–28.
Bartha D. (szerk.) 2000: A tervezett Őrség–Rába Nemzeti Parkot megalapozó botanikai-zoológiai kutatások I–X. Nyugat-Magyarországi Egyetem, Sopron, 767 pp. + 72 térkép.
Bartha D. (szerk.) 2012: Természetvédelmi növénytan. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 273–278.
Bartha D., Király G., Schmidt D., Tiborcz V., Barina Z., Csiky J., Jakab G., Lesku B., Schmotzer A., Vidéki R., Vojtkó A., Zólyomi Sz. 2015: Magyarország edényes növényfajainak elterjedési atlasza. Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Kiadó, Sopron, 329 pp.
Baskin C. C., Baskin J. M. 1998: Seeds – ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego, 666 pp.
Baskin C., Milberg P., Andersson L., Baskin J. M. 2001: Seed dormancy-breaking and germination requirements of Drosera anglica, an insectivorous species of the Northern Hemisphere. Acta Oecologica 22: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1146-609x(00)01093-6
Bojnansky V., Fargasová A. 2007: Atlas of seeds and fruits of Central and East-European flora, the Carpathian Mountains Region. Springer, 1046 pp.; pp. 243–244.
Campbell D. R., Rochefort L. 2003: Germination and seedling growth of bog plants in relation to the recolonization of milled peatlands. Plant Ecology 169: 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026258114901
Chung M. Y., López-Pujol J., Chung M. G. 2013: Population history of the two carnivorous plants Drosera peltata var. nipponica and Drosera rotundifolia (Droseraceae) in Korea. American Journal of Botany 100(11): 2231–2239. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200486
Crowder A. A., Pearson M. C., Grubbs P. J., Langlois P. H. 1990: Biological flora of the British Isles. No. 167. Drosera L. Journal of Ecology 78: 233–267.
Czenthe B. 1985: A keleméri Mohostavak cönológia viszonyai. Botanikai Közlemények 72: 89–122.
D’amato P. 1998: The Savage Garden: cultivating carnivorous plants. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, 314 pp.
Darwin C. 1875: Insectivorous plants. John Murray, London, 450 pp.
Darwin F. 1878: Experiments on the nutrition of Drosera rotundifolia. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 17: 17–32.
Engelhardt T. L. 1998: Pollination ecology of the round-leaved sundew, Drosera rotundifolia L. (Droseraceae), in Sequoia National Park, California. PhD dissertation, California State University Fullerton, CA., 124 pp.
Farkas S. 1999: Magyarország védett növényei. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, 416 pp.
Galambosi B., Galambosi Zs., Repcák M. 2000: Growth, yield and secondary metabolite production of Drosera species cultivated in peat beds in Finland. Suo 51: 47–57.
Galambosi B. 2002: Elaboration of field growing techniques of Drosera species. Drogenreport 15(28): 56–58.
Galántai M., Kereszty Z. 1994: A fajok védelme termőhelyükön kívül. A Kertészeti és Élelmiszeripari Egyetem Közleményei 54: 26–28.
Isépy I., Mihalik E., Orlóci L., Papp L., Radvánszky A., Zsigmond V. 2013: Ex-situ növénymegőrzés. Gyűjteményes kertek a növényvilág megőrzéséért. MABOSZ, Budapest, pp. 7–13.
Labat Jean-Jacques 2003: Fleischfressende Pflanzen Auswählen und Pflegen. (Selection and maintenance of carnivorous plants). Ulmer, Stuttgart, 96 pp. (in German).
Lloyd F. E. 1942: The carnivorous plants. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA., 352 pp.
Moore P. D. 2002: The future of cool temperate bogs. Environmental Conservation 29: 3–20.
Murza G. L., Davis a. R. 2003: Comparative flower structure of three species of sundew (Drosera anglica, Drosera linearis, and Drosera rotundifolia) in relation to breeding system. Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-104
Nordbakken J. F., Rydgren K., Oakland R. H. 2004: Demography and population dynamics of Drosera anglica and D. rotundifolia. Journal of Ecology 92: 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2004.00839.x
Sagan K., Pogorzelec M. 2011: Attempt to determine the optimal conditions for culture of endangered plants species of the genus Drosera, in terms of their ex situ conservation. Teka Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska 8: 145–150.
Schulze W., Schulze E. D. 1990: Insect capture and growth of the insectivorous Drosera rotundifolia L. Oecologia 82: 427–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317494
Simon T. 2000: A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója. Harasztok – virágos növények. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, 976 pp.
Sulyok J., Ilonczai Z. 2002: Lápok. Nemzeti Ökológiai Hálózat, 3. füzet, Környezetvédelmi Minisztérium Természetvédelmi Hivatala, Budapest, 28 pp.
Svensson B. M. 1995: Competition between Sphagnum fuscum and Drosera rotundifolia: a case of ecosystem engineering. Oikos 74: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545649
Swales D. E. 1975: An unusual habitat for Drosera rotundifolia L., its over-wintering state, and vegetative reproduction. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 89: 143–147.
Szépligeti M. 2011: Megőrzési tervek az Őrségi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság területén. Prioritás: Kereklevelű harmatfű (Drosera rotundifolia L.). Kézirat, Őrségi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, Őriszentpéter, 10 pp.
Szépligeti M. 2014: Feljegyzés a kereklevelű harmatfű (Drosera rotundifolia) érdekében végzett fajvédelmi tevékenységről. Kézirat, Őrségi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, 5 pp.
Szépligeti M. 2015: Feljegyzés a kereklevelű harmatfű (Drosera rotundifolia) érdekében végzett fajvédelmi tevékenységről. Kézirat, Őrségi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, 5 pp.
Vojnic-Zelic D. 2017: A kereklevelű harmatfű gyakorlati természetvédelme az Őrségi Nemzeti Parkban. Szakdolgozat, Soproni Egyetem, Erdőmérnöki Kar, Növénytani és Természetvédelmi Intézet, 54 pp.
Weilbrenner I. 1974: Vegetative Vermehrung und Wuchsstoffhaushalt bei dem Rundblättrigen
Sonnentau (Drosera rotundifolia) (Vegetative propagation and growth budget in roundleaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia)). Mitteilungen der Pollichia 21: 46–67. (in German).
Wolf E., Gage E., Cooper D. J. 2006: Drosera rotundifolia L. (roundleaf sundew): A technical conservation assessment. Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region,
Species Conservation Project, 57 pp. Available: http:// fsweb.r2.fs.fed.us/rr/scp/plants/dicots/droserarotundifolia.pdf [2018.09.06.]